| Home | Libraries | People | FAQ | More

## C++11/C++14 Conformance

Boost.Container aims for full C++11 conformance except reasoned deviations, backporting as much as possible for C++03. Obviously, this conformance is a work in progress so this section explains what C++11 features are implemented and which of them have been backported to C++03 compilers.

### Move and Emplace

For compilers with rvalue references and for those C++03 types that use Boost.Move rvalue reference emulation Boost.Container supports all C++11 features related to move semantics: containers are movable, requirements for `value_type` are those specified for C++11 containers.

For compilers with variadic templates, Boost.Container supports placement insertion (`emplace`, ...) functions from C++11. For those compilers without variadic templates support Boost.Container uses the preprocessor to create a set of overloads up to a finite number of parameters.

### Stateful allocators

C++03 was not stateful-allocator friendly. For compactness of container objects and for simplicity, it did not require containers to support allocators with state: Allocator objects need not be stored in container objects. It was not possible to store an allocator with state, say an allocator that holds a pointer to an arena from which to allocate. C++03 allowed implementors to suppose two allocators of the same type always compare equal (that means that memory allocated by one allocator object could be deallocated by another instance of the same type) and allocators were not swapped when the container was swapped.

C++11 further improves stateful allocator support through `std::allocator_traits`. `std::allocator_traits` is the protocol between a container and an allocator, and an allocator writer can customize its behaviour (should the container propagate it in move constructor, swap, etc.?) following `allocator_traits` requirements. Boost.Container not only supports this model with C++11 but also backports it to C++03 via `boost::container::allocator_traits` including some C++17 changes. This class offers some workarounds for C++03 compilers to achieve the same allocator guarantees as `std::allocator_traits`.

In [Boost.Container] containers, if possible, a single allocator is hold to construct `value_type`s. If the container needs an auxiliary allocator (e.g. an array allocator used by `deque` or `stable_vector`), that allocator is also stored in the container and initialized from the user-supplied allocator when the container is constructed (i.e. it's not constructed on the fly when auxiliary memory is needed).

### Scoped allocators

C++11 improves stateful allocators with the introduction of `std::scoped_allocator_adaptor` class template. `scoped_allocator_adaptor` is instantiated with one outer allocator and zero or more inner allocators.

A scoped allocator is a mechanism to automatically propagate the state of the allocator to the subobjects of a container in a controlled way. If instantiated with only one allocator type, the inner allocator becomes the `scoped_allocator_adaptor` itself, thus using the same allocator resource for the container and every element within the container and, if the elements themselves are containers, each of their elements recursively. If instantiated with more than one allocator, the first allocator is the outer allocator for use by the container, the second allocator is passed to the constructors of the container's elements, and, if the elements themselves are containers, the third allocator is passed to the elements' elements, and so on.

Boost.Container implements its own `scoped_allocator_adaptor` class and backports this feature also to C++03 compilers. Due to C++03 limitations, in those compilers the allocator propagation implemented by `scoped_allocator_adaptor::construct` functions will be based on traits (`constructible_with_allocator_suffix` and `constructible_with_allocator_prefix`) proposed in N2554: The Scoped Allocator Model (Rev 2) proposal. In conforming C++11 compilers or compilers supporting SFINAE expressions (when `BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR` is NOT defined), traits are ignored and C++11 rules (`is_constructible<T, Args..., inner_allocator_type>::value` and `is_constructible<T, allocator_arg_t, inner_allocator_type, Args...>::value`) will be used to detect if the allocator must be propagated with suffix or prefix allocator arguments.

### Insertion hints in associative containers and preserving insertion ordering for elements with equivalent keys

LWG Issue #233 corrected a defect in C++98 and specified how equivalent keys were to be inserted in associative containers. Boost.Container implements the C++11 changes that were specified in N1780 Comments on LWG issue 233: Insertion hints in associative containers:

- `a_eq.insert(t)`: If a range containing elements equivalent to t exists in a_eq, t is inserted at the end of that range.
- `a_eq.insert(p,t)`: t is inserted as close as possible to the position just prior to p.

### Initializer lists

Boost.Container supports initialization, assignments and insertions from initializer lists in compilers that implement this feature.

### Null Forward Iterators

Boost.Container implements C++14 Null Forward Iterators, which means that value-initialized iterators may be compared and compare equal to other value-initialized iterators of the same type. Value initialized iterators behave as if they refer past the end of the same empty sequence (example taken from N3644):

    vector<int> v = { ... };
    auto ni = vector<int>::iterator();
    auto nd = vector<double>::iterator();
    ni == ni; // True.
    nd != nd; // False.
    v.begin() == ni; // ??? (likely false in practice).
    v.end() == ni;   // ??? (likely false in practice).
    ni == nd; // Won't compile.

### `forward_list<T>`

Boost.Container does not offer C++11 `forward_list` container yet, but it will be available in future versions.

### `vector` vs. `std::vector` exception guarantees

`vector` does not support the strong exception guarantees given by `std::vector` in functions like `insert`, `push_back`, `emplace`, `emplace_back`, `resize`, `reserve` or `shrink_to_fit` for either copyable or no-throw moveable classes. In C++11 move_if_noexcept is used to maintain C++03 exception safety guarantees combined with C++11 move semantics. This strong exception guarantee degrades the insertion performance of copyable and throwing-moveable types, degrading moves to copies when such types are inserted in the vector using the aforementioned members.

This strong exception guarantee also precludes the possibility of using some type of in-place reallocations that can further improve the insertion performance of `vector` See Extended Allocators to know more about these optimizations.

`vector` always uses move constructors/assignments to rearrange elements in the vector and uses memory expansion mechanisms if the allocator supports them, while offering only basic safety guarantees. It trades off exception guarantees for an improved performance.

### Parameter taken by const reference that can be changed

Several container operations use a parameter taken by const reference that can be changed during execution of the function. LWG Issue 526 (Is it undefined if a function in the standard changes in parameters?) discusses them:

    //Given std::vector<int> v
    v.insert(v.begin(), v[2]);
    //v[2] can be changed by moving elements of vector

    //Given std::list<int> l:
    l.remove(*l.begin())
    //The operation could delete the first element, and then continue trying to access it.

The adopted resolution, NAD (Not A Defect), implies that previous operations must be well-defined. This requires code to detect a reference to an inserted element and an additional copy in that case, impacting performance even when references to already inserted objects are not used. Note that equivalent functions taking rvalue references or iterator ranges require elements not already inserted in the container.

Boost.Container prioritizes performance and has not implemented the NAD resolution: in functions that might modify the argument, the library requires references to elements not stored in the container. Using references to inserted elements yields to undefined behaviour (although in debug mode, this precondition violation could be notified via BOOST_ASSERT).

### `vector<bool>` specialization

`vector<bool>` specialization has been quite problematic, and there have been several unsuccessful tries to deprecate or remove it from the standard. Boost.Container does not implement it as there is a superior Boost.DynamicBitset solution. For issues with `vector<bool>` see the following papers:

- On `vector<bool>`
- vector<bool>: N1211: More Problems, Better Solutions,
- N2160: Library Issue 96: Fixing vector<bool>,
- N2204 A Specification to deprecate vector<bool>.

Quotes:

- “But it is a shame that the C++ committee gave this excellent data structure the name vector<bool> and that it gives no guidance nor encouragement on the critical generic algorithms that need to be optimized for this data structure. Consequently, few std::lib implementations go to this trouble.”
- “In 1998, admitting that the committee made a mistake was controversial. Since then Java has had to deprecate such significant portions of their libraries that the idea C++ would be ridiculed for deprecating a single minor template specialization seems quaint.”
- “`vector<bool>` is not a container and `vector<bool>::iterator` is not a random-access iterator (or even a forward or bidirectional iterator either, for that matter). This has already broken user code in the field in mysterious ways.”
- “`vector<bool>` forces a specific (and potentially bad) optimization choice on all users by enshrining it in the standard. The optimization is premature; different users have different requirements. This too has already hurt users who have been forced to implement workarounds to disable the 'optimization' (e.g., by using a vector<char> and manually casting to/from bool).”

So `boost::container::vector<bool>::iterator` returns real `bool` references and works as a fully compliant container. If you need a memory optimized version of `boost::container::vector<bool>`, please use Boost.DynamicBitset.

### Non-standard value initialization using `std::memset`

Boost.Container uses `std::memset` with a zero value to initialize some types as in most platforms this initialization yields to the desired value initialization with improved performance.

Following the C11 standard, Boost.Container assumes that for any integer type, the object representation where all the bits are zero shall be a representation of the value zero in that type. Since `_Bool`/`wchar_t`/`char16_t`/`char32_t` are also integer types in C, it considers all C++ integral types as initializable via `std::memset`.

By default, Boost.Container also considers floating point types to be initializable using `std::memset`. Most platforms are compatible with this initialization, but in case this initialization is not desirable the user can `#define BOOST_CONTAINER_MEMZEROED_FLOATING_POINT_IS_NOT_ZERO` before including library headers.

By default, it also considers pointer types (pointer and pointer to function types, excluding member object and member function pointers) to be initializable using `std::memset`. Most platforms are compatible with this initialization, but in case this initialization is not desired the user can `#define BOOST_CONTAINER_MEMZEROED_POINTER_IS_NOT_ZERO` before including library headers.

If neither `BOOST_CONTAINER_MEMZEROED_FLOATING_POINT_IS_NOT_ZERO` nor `BOOST_CONTAINER_MEMZEROED_POINTER_IS_NOT_ZERO` is defined Boost.Container also considers POD types to be value initializable via `std::memset` with value zero.